Amundson

Amundson v. Catello

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 3, 2025D082158ACalifornia3,730 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/3/25; on rehearing

OPINION ON REHEARING

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

TAMARA AMUNDSON et al., D082158

Cross-complainants and Respondents. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2022-00004784- v. CU-OR-CTL)

RUTH CATELLO,

Cross-defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Kevin A. Enright, Judge. Appellant’s request for judicial notice denied. Respondents’ motion to augment granted. Reversed. Higgs Fletcher & Mack, John Morris and Steven M. Brunolli, for Cross- defendant and Appellant. Leo Law Office, Shawn Leo; Williams Iagmin and Jon R. Williams, for Cross-complainants and Respondents. At the time of her death in 2020, Leslie J. Knoles (Decedent) and Ruth Catello co-owned certain real estate (the property). After Decedent passed away, the property’s title became the subject of parallel legal proceedings. Since 2021, Catello and Decedent’s four surviving siblings (the siblings) have been involved in probate proceedings concerning the property and other assets of Decedent’s estate. At the same time, Catello and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.