In re Bailey B. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
In April 2023, DPSS took newborn Bailey into protective custody after Mother
and the baby tested positive for amphetamines at Bailey’s birth. Mother disclosed that
she had been using methamphetamine daily for the past five years. Father disclosed that
he had recently used methamphetamine with Mother.
Mother lived with the maternal great-aunt. Mother identified the maternal aunt as
someone willing to care for Bailey; the maternal aunt and the maternal grandmother lived
in Oregon.
Both parents denied any Indian ancestry when interviewed by the social worker,
and they filed Judicial Council ICWA-020 forms indicating the same.
DPSS filed a petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision
(b), alleging that both parents abused controlled substances. (Unlabeled statutory
Because ICWA uses the term “Indian,” we use it as well “to reflect the statutory language.” (In re Dezi C. (2024) 16 Cal.5th 1112, 1125, fn. 1 (Dezi C.).) No disrespect is intended.
2 references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) The court detained Bailey from
both parents. It found that “ICWA likely does not apply” but directed DPSS to continue
its ICWA…