Dalavai
Dalavai v. University of California San Diego Health
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDAL JEROME DALAVAI, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01471-CAB-DDL Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION DONNA LOZA, et al., 14 Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 99 and 102] 15 16 17 Plaintiff has filed two motions for reconsideration relating to the Court’s order denying Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. [Doc. Nos. 99 and 102.] The Court considers the amended motion. “The moving party under Rule 60(b) is entitled to relief from judgment for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.” Am. Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. N. Am. Const. Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 899 (9th Cir. 2001). 27 28 Plaintiff, moving under prongs one and six, claims that the…