Argishti Tigranyan v. Merrick Garland
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARGISHTI TIGRANYAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00741-SPG-RAO
Plaintiff,
JUDGMENT
v. MERRICK B. GARLAND,
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
UNITED STATES, et al., Defendant.
Upon review of the Joint Briefing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35) and consideration of the parties’ briefs and arguments, the Court found that application of the “TRAC factors,” as set forth in Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 80 (D.C. Cir. 1984) weighed in favor of Defendants, the delay in adjudicating Plaintiff’s asylum application was not unreasonable, and granting summary judgment to Defendants is appropriate. This Court thus granted summary judgment for Defendants and awarded no relief to Plaintiff. // // // For all the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that JUDGMENT is 2 || entered in favor of Defendants. The Clerk is directed to close…