Argishti Tigranyan v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20252:24-cv-00741California211 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARGISHTI TIGRANYAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00741-SPG-RAO

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND,

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

UNITED STATES, et al., Defendant.

Upon review of the Joint Briefing on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 35) and consideration of the parties’ briefs and arguments, the Court found that application of the “TRAC factors,” as set forth in Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. FCC, 750 F.2d 70, 80 (D.C. Cir. 1984) weighed in favor of Defendants, the delay in adjudicating Plaintiff’s asylum application was not unreasonable, and granting summary judgment to Defendants is appropriate. This Court thus granted summary judgment for Defendants and awarded no relief to Plaintiff. // // // For all the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that JUDGMENT is 2 || entered in favor of Defendants. The Clerk is directed to close…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.