Stanley, Jr. v. Sgt Holland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20253:24-cv-06493California2,299 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RODRIC P. STANLEY, JR., Case No. 24-cv-06493-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SERVICE

v. 10 Re: Dkt. No. 9 SGT HOLLAND, et al., Defendants.

13 Plaintiff, a former detainee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed due to a global settlement agreement regarding claims arising from his detention. He filed a response. The order to show cause is discharged and the Court will review the complaint. DISCUSSION STANDARD OF REVIEW Federal courts engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the Court must identify any cognizable claims, and dismiss any claims which are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seek…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.