Pimentel
Pimentel v. SeaWorld
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALBERTO PIMENTAL, et al., Case No.: 3:24-cv-00127-JAH-SBC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT
PREJUDICE AND DENYING
SEA WORLD PARKS, INC., et al.,
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SET AN
Defendants. OSC RE: SANCTIONS
16 [ECF No. 34] INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Alberto Pimental’s and Guadalupe Ramirez’ (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Dismiss Action Without Prejudice and Motion to Set an Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions. ECF No. 34 (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Defendant SeaWorld LLC1 filed a Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion on March 24, 2025. ECF No. 35 (“Opposition” or “Opp’n”). Plaintiffs subsequently filed a Reply on April 2, 2025. ECF No. 38 (“Reply”). On April 3, 2025, the Court determined this matter is suitable for adjudication on the briefing and without oral argument, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1.…