Scoggins

Scoggins v. Falcon Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20251:24-cv-00188California2,200 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 DANELL R. SCOGGINS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00188-KES-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT THE CASE BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM FALCON COURT, TURNING POINT OF (Doc. 14)

CENTRAL CALIFORNIA,

21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

15 16 I. INTRODUCTION A. Background Plaintiff Danell Scoggins, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint on February 9, 2024. (Doc. 1). The undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and concluded that it failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 7). The undersigned then advised Plaintiff that she had three options for how to proceed: Plaintiff could file (1) an amended complaint, which would be screened in due course; (2) a statement that she wishes to stand on the initial complaint and have it reviewed by the presiding district judge, in which case the Court would issue findings and recommendations to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.