Ceballos

(PC) Harris v. Ceballos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20251:24-cv-00389California4,354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARNEST S. HARRIS, Case No. 1:24-cv-00389-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION CEBALLOS, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

Defendant. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE

TO OBEY COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE (ECF No. 8) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 19 I. Background Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 4, 2024, the Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 8.) The Court issued an order granting Plaintiff leave to file a first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.