Oregel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL BENTLY MARION II, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00872-KES-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO OBEY COURT ORDERS

EDGAR OREGEL, et al., 21-DAY RESPONSE DEADLINE Defendants.

Plaintiff Carl Bently Marion II is represented by attorney Michael R. Hayden in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On May 9, 2025, this Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 9.) The Court found that Plaintiff’s complaint plausibly alleges an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Merritt but fails to allege any other cognizable claim against any other named Defendant. (Id. at 4-26.) Plaintiff was ordered to do one of the following within 21 days: (1) notify the Court in writing that he did not wish to file a first amended complaint and was willing to proceed only on his…