Banuelos
Griggs v. Banuelos
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MICHAEL GRIGGS Case No. 1:25-cv-00613-KES-SKO
Plaintiff,
FINDINGS AND
v. RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE
B ST E A D T I E SM A I C SS L E A D IM F OR FAILURE TO 13 JOHN BANUELOS, (Docs. 1, 4, 5) Defendant.
TWENTY-ONE-DAY DEADLINE
16 Plaintiff Michael Griggs is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on May 23, 2025. (Doc. 1). On May 28, 2025, the undersigned screened the complaint, concluding that Plaintiff stated no cognizable claims but providing Plaintiff with options to proceed. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff filed a response to the screening order on June 2, 2025, notifying the Court that he wished to stand on his complaint. (Doc. 5.) Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has twenty-one days…