Chandra

(PC) Garcia v. Chandra

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20252:22-cv-01221California3,756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBEN DARIO GARCIA, JR., No. 2:22-cv-1221 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING

ORDER

A. CHANDRA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint. Multiple motions are pending. I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS In his first amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that while he was housed at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”), defendants A. Chandra, K. Mohr, J. Quiring, J. Charon, and J. Weiss: (a) retaliated against plaintiff in violation of the First Amendment by verbally threatening plaintiff, and issuing a rules violation report (“RVR”) asserting false allegations in retaliation for plaintiff filing a grievance against defendant A. Chandra; (b) violated plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights by housing him in segregated housing and detention, resulting in a long term deprivation of outdoor exercise, despite plaintiff’s chronic depressive disorder and serious 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.