(PC) James v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, Case No. 2:22-cv-2193-DAD-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has two motions pending: a motion to modify the scheduling order, ECF No. 98, and a motion to subpoena non-party documents, ECF No. 99. I will grant in part and deny in part plaintiff’s motion to modify the scheduling order and deny plaintiff’s motion to subpoena non- party documents. Motion to Modify First, plaintiff moves to modify the scheduling order. ECF No. 98. He requests that the discovery deadline be moved from July 11, 2025, to September 11, 2025. Id. at 2. He notes that he has another case currently in the discovery phase, and he is in the beginning stages of appealing another. Id. He has also been transferred to varying instructions over the past few months. Id. As such, he is having difficulty meeting the current discovery deadline. Id. He…