Hessenn Group LLC v. InnerScope Hearing Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20252:24-cv-00794California2,739 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HESSENN GROUP LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00794-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED

INNERSCOPE HEARING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

15 Defendant. (ECF No. 16)

17 Plaintiff Hessenn Group LLC moves the Court for default judgment against defendant InnerScope Hearing Technologies, Inc. (“InnerScope”).1 (ECF No. 16.) Specifically, plaintiff seeks a default judgment against defendant for damages in the amount of $2,247,975.83 plus post-judgment interest for breach of contract and account stated. Defendant has neither appeared nor opposed the motion. Plaintiff filed an initial motion for default judgment on August 2, 2024 (ECF No. 11), but then filed an amended motion on December 2, 2024 (ECF No. 16). The amended motion is before the Court. The Court previously ordered this motion submitted without appearance and argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) & (g). (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.