(PS) Moore v. C.F.Y. Development Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLESETTA MOORE. SR., No. 2:25-cv-0034-DAD-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 C.F.Y. DEVELOPMENT INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Charlesetta Moore1 proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis and seeks relief under the Fair Housing Act. This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 4) is before the court for screening. I. Screening Requirement Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis proceeding, and must order dismissal of the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-

26 1 The initial complaint filed in this action listed Charlesetta Moore and Elizabeth McDaniels as plaintiffs, both proceeding without…