Bondi

Luna Peinado v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202523-2372California474 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FAUSTINO LUNA PEINADO, No. 23-2372 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-191-998 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 2, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: RAWLINSON, BRESS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Faustino Luna-Peinado (Luna-Peinado), a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing

his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying his application for

cancellation of removal. We deny the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Application of the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship “statutory

criterion . . . to a set of established facts . . .…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.