Amaro-Saltillo

Amaro-Saltillo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202523-29California890 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTOR MANUEL AMARO-SALTILLO, No. 23-29 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-274-390 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 2, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: RAWLINSON, BRESS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Victor Manuel Amaro-Saltillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal

from an Immigration Judge (IJ) order denying cancellation of removal. Amaro-

Saltillo also challenges the BIA’s denial of his request for administrative closure of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny

the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.