Kemp
United States v. Kemp
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202524-782California565 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-782 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:22-cr-00086-BMM-2 v.
MEMORANDUM*
REMBRANDT CARLOS KEMP,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 22, 2025** Seattle, Washington
Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Defendant, Rembrandt Carlos Kemp, contends that the district court erred in
the voir dire process by not allowing him to question the jury pool and by passing
Prospective Juror 29 without further questioning. We review challenges to the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s actions in the voir dire process for abuse of discretion. United