Kemp

United States v. Kemp

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202524-782California565 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-782 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:22-cr-00086-BMM-2 v.

MEMORANDUM*

REMBRANDT CARLOS KEMP,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 22, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Defendant, Rembrandt Carlos Kemp, contends that the district court erred in

the voir dire process by not allowing him to question the jury pool and by passing

Prospective Juror 29 without further questioning. We review challenges to the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s actions in the voir dire process for abuse of discretion. United

States v. Anekwu, 695 F.3d 967,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.