United States v. Bell Wilson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202523-3956California2,154 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3956 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:21-cr-00222-FLA-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ALEXANDER DECLAN BELL WILSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, BENNETT, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Alexander Declan Bell Wilson appeals from his jury conviction of

distributing fentanyl that killed a minor, N.Y. Wilson argues that several errors

made his trial fundamentally unfair. As the parties are familiar with the facts, we

do not recount them here. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

reverse and remand for retrial.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. We reject Wilson’s challenges to the following:

a. We review Wilson’s due process…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.