Easterling
Easterling v. Henkels & McCoy CA2/6
Opinion
Opinion
Baltodano, J.
Filed 6/4/25 Easterling v. Henkels & McCoy CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
GAYLE EASTERLING, 2d Civ. No. B341336 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2023- Plaintiff and Appellant, 00574619-CU-PO-VTA) (Ventura County) v.
HENKELS & McCOY, INC.,
Defendant and Respondent.
Raymond Easterling (Easterling) and his wife Gayle Easterling (the Easterlings) sued Henkels & McCoy, Inc. (Henkels) for Easterling’s injuries from asbestos exposure. The Easterlings appealed from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment against them.1 Appellant contends Henkels made an insufficient showing to shift the burden of proof on summary judgment, and the trial court erred in denying a motion to
1 Gayle Easterling was substituted in as…