Lillard

United States v. Lillard

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 202524-3055California293 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 4 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3055 D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00007-RSM-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

LONNIE EUGENE LILLARD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 21, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Lonnie Eugene Lillard appeals from the district court’s order denying

resentencing in this case following this court’s remand in his related supervised

release proceedings, and the amended judgment modifying the restitution order.

Lillard’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.