Ducky Ltd. v. Iviliia Millionic IT Sp. z o.o.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20253:24-cv-02268California2,924 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 DUCKY LTD., Case No. 24-cv-02268-PHK

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION

SEEKING REFERENCE OF

v. QUESTIONS TO THE U.S.

COPYRIGHT OFFICE (17 U.S.C.

IVILIIA MILLIONIC IT SP. Z O.O., § 411(B)(2)) Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

This is a copyright case. Now before the Court is Plaintiff Ducky, LTD’s (“Ducky”) ex parte motion seeking an Order from this Court referring certain questions to be sent to the U.S. Copyright Office pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 411(b)(2). [Dkt. 37]. Ducky has not requested oral argument on this motion, and the Court finds this dispute appropriate for resolution without oral argument. Civil L. R. 7-1(b). After carefully considering the submissions and applicable legal standards, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff Ducky’s ex parte motion [Dkt. 37]. BACKGROUND The following facts are either uncontested or, if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.