Mario Patino v. D. Dominguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20253:25-cv-00589California2,402 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO PATINO, Case No. 25-cv-00589-BAS-KSC

CDCR #F05346,

ORDER DISMISSING

Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO vs. STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 14 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) AND

1915A(b)

D. DOMINGUEZ, et al.,

16 Defendants.

19

Mario Patino (“Patino” or “Plaintiff”), a prisoner currently confined at Centinela State Prison (“CEN”), is proceeding pro se with a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was originally filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on November 22, 2024. (See ECF No. 1.) That court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on January 24, 2025. (ECF No. 6.) On March 10, 2025, however, that court found venue was proper in the Southern District of California and transferred the case to this Court. (ECF No. 10.) In his Complaint, Patino alleges that Defendants violated his rights under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.