Do

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HANH THI MY DO, Case No.: 25-cv-1112-RSH-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING MOTION TO ORANGE COUNTY SSA, WPD, et al., PROCEED IN FORMA Defendants. PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING

COMPLAINT WITHOUT

PREJUDICE; AND (2) DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE

ELECTRONICALLY. 19 [ECF Nos. 1, 2, 4]

21 On May 1, 2025, Plaintiff Hanh Thi My Do, proceeding pro se, filed a civil action 22 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Orange County Superior Court and numerous 23 other defendants. At the time of filing, Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fees required 24 by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 25 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). ECF No. 2. 26 // 27 // 28 I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP Generally, all parties instituting a civil action in this court must pay a filing…