Macomber
(PC) Cramer v. Macomber
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MATTHEW B. CRAMER, No. 1:25-cv-00489-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO
v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL
JEFF MACOMBER, et al., (ECF No. 12) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this action, without prejudice, filed June 2, 2025. (ECF No. 12.) “[U]nder Rule 41(a)(1)(i), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999) (quotation and citation omitted). “[A] dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is effective on filing, no court order is required, the parties are left as though no action had been brought, the defendant can't complain, and…