Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND GEORGE GLASS, No. 2:24-cv-3020 DC CSK P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JAMES HILL, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On October 30, 2024, petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) On December 17, 2024, petitioner paid the filing fee. On March 20, 2025, petitioner was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as untimely. Following an extension of time, petitioner filed his response on May 27, 2025. As discussed below, the Court finds that the petition is untimely, and recommends that this action be dismissed. I. BACKGROUND Petitioner was convicted in Stanislaus County Superior Court, No. 1027257. See People v. Raymond George Glass, 114 Cal. App. 4th 1032 (5th Dist. Jan. 6, 2004). On appeal, the California Court of Appeal dismissed certain enhancements, affirmed the…