(PS) Whitaker v. Solano Supreme Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD C. WHITAKER, No. 2:25-cv-1044-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SOLANO SUPERIOR COURT, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On April 15, 2025, the undersigned issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a valid claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. Plaintiff was advised that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation of dismissal. That time has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. In light of these recommendations, IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in…