Rogers v. City of Redlands CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 5, 2025G063580California4,345 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

Filed 6/4/25 Rogers v. City of Redlands CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

STEVE ROGERS,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G063580

v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVSB2126031)

CITY OF REDLANDS, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, Joseph T. Ortiz, Judge. Affirmed. Benink & Slavens, Eric J. Benink and Vincent D. Slavens; Kearney Littlefield, Thomas A. Kearney and Prescott W. Littlefield for Plaintiff and Appellant Steve Rogers. Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, Michael G. Colantuono and Meghan A. Wharton for Defendant and Appellant City of Redlands. Best Best & Krieger, Lutfi Kharuf, Chloe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.