Bondi

Hernandez Umana v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 202523-2644California822 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

POMPILIO HERNANDEZ UMANA, No. 23-2644 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-149-467 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted May 20, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: BERZON, FRIEDLAND, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Pompilio Hernandez-Umana, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We deny

the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. This Court “may review a final order of removal only if . . . the alien has

exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.” 8 U.S.C. §

1252(d)(1). “To exhaust a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.