Schuman
Schuman v. Microchip Technology Incorporated
Opinion
Opinion
Sidney R. Thomas, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PETER SCHUMAN; WILLIAM No. 24-2624,
COPLIN, 24-2978
D.C. No. Plaintiffs – Appellants / 4:16-cv-05544- Cross-Appellees,
HSG
v.
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY OPINION
INCORPORATED; ATMEL
CORPORATION; ATMEL
CORPORATION UNITED STATES
SEVERANCE GUARANTEE
BENEFIT PROGRAM,
Defendants – Appellees / Cross-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 12, 2025 San Francisco, California
Filed June 5, 2025
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, William A. Fletcher, and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Sidney R. Thomas
SUMMARY*
Release of Claims / ERISA
The panel reversed the district court’s summary judgment against Peter Schuman and William Coplin in a case concerning the enforceability of a release of claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”); remanded to the district court for further proceedings; and dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction a…