People v. Jarmon CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 5, 2025C098895California10,953 words

Opinion

Opinion

Krause, J.

BACKGROUND

Second Amended Information The second amended information charged Jarmon and Long in count one with murder. (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a).)2 The information alleged the special circumstance that, in the commission of the murder, defendants were engaged in the commission of robbery (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)), and the sentence enhancement that, in the commission of the murder, defendants were armed with a firearm (§ 12022, subd. (a)(1)). The information charged Jarmon and Long in count two with robbery in the second degree (§ 211), and alleged that, in the commission of the robbery, defendants were armed with a

Further undesignated section references are to the Penal Code.

2 firearm (§ 12022, subd. (a)(1)). In count three, the information charged Jarmon, Long, and Johnson with attempted robbery in the second degree (§§ 664, 211), and further alleged that in the commission of the attempted robbery, defendants were armed with a firearm (§ 12022, subd. (a)(1)). The information alleged circumstances in aggravation as to both Jarmon (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.421(a)(8)) and Long (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.421(a)(8), (b)(2), (b)(3)). The information alleged Long had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.