Steiger

Steiger v. Alameda Health System CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 5, 2025A169457California3,667 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 6/5/25 Steiger v. Alameda Health System CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

SHONETTE STEIGER,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A169457

v. ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG19038883) Defendant and Appellant.

Alameda Health System (AHS) appeals from an award of attorney fees to its former employee, Shonette Steiger, who prevailed at trial on claims she brought under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code,1 § 12900 et seq. (FEHA)). After a jury trial resulted in a judgment in her favor, Steiger sought an award of $1,901,997.25 in attorney fees, which included a multiplier of 1.5. After a hearing, the trial court issued a detailed and closely reasoned eight-page single-spaced order awarding fees of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.