Baghirzade
Baghirzade v. Armenian National Committee of America
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AYNUR BAGHIRZADE, Case No.: 24-cv-1077-RSH-MMP
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
Plaintiff, RULE 59(e) MOTION TO AMEND v. JUDGMENT
ARMENIAN NATIONAL
[ECF No. 200] COMMITTEE OF AMERICA et al., 16 Defendants.
19 On April 14, 2025, the Court ordered the striking of Plaintiff’s Third Amended 20 Complaint (“TAC”), and dismissal of the action, based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with 21 the Court’s earlier order of February 27, 2025 as well as applicable local rules specifically 22 referenced in that order. See ECF Nos. 176, 192. Judgment was entered the same day. ECF 23 No. 193. 24 On May 7, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend the judgment pursuant to Federal 25 Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), arguing that the Court’s April 14, 2025 order was legally 26 27 erroneous. ECF No. 200. Defendants Los Angeles County Bar Association, Coco Su, and Seth Chavez filed an opposition, and Plaintiff filed a…