Moore

Moore v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20253:24-cv-02159California4,928 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DARREN MOORE, Case No.: 3:24-cv-2159-RBM-LR

CDCR # AZ5561,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 12 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

JAMES HILL, Warden; RYAN [Doc. 2];

BARENCHI, MD; M. BLAISDELL, MD;

S. GATES, K. RODRIGUEZ, BENNY (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

MARTIN, MD; CDCR; B. CAMPBELL;

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

JOHN DOES #1–5,

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

Defendants. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) 18 19 Plaintiff Darren Moore (“Plaintiff”), an inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Complaint”) (Doc. 1), along with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Motion”) (Doc. 2). In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that while he was confined at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), James Hill, Dr. Ryan Barenchi, Dr. M.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.