Solorio
(PC) Maestas v. Solorio
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20251:23-cv-00603California1,620 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY MAESTAS, No. 1:23-cv-00603 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION
v.
ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL
SOLORIO, et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
Defendants. TO KEEP COURT APPRISED OF HIS
CURRENT ADDRESS
16 (ECF No. 7)
PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE IN
FOURTEEN DAYS 19 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address. Plaintiff will have fourteen days to file objections to this order. I. RELEVANT FACTS On…