Solorio

(PC) Maestas v. Solorio

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20251:23-cv-00603California1,620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY MAESTAS, No. 1:23-cv-00603 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

v.

ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL

SOLORIO, et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

Defendants. TO KEEP COURT APPRISED OF HIS

CURRENT ADDRESS

16 (ECF No. 7)

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE IN

FOURTEEN DAYS 19 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address. Plaintiff will have fourteen days to file objections to this order. I. RELEVANT FACTS On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.