Burns

(PC) Jaramillo v. Burns

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20251:23-cv-00666California815 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDIE JARAMILLO, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00666-JLT-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE ISSUED MAY 28, 2025

v. (Doc. 38) JOSEPH BURNES, et al.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DIRECTED TO

Defendants. ANTHONY R. RODRIGUEZ FOR HIS

FAILURE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE

PLEADING

RESPONSE DEADLINE: JUNE 27, 2025

Plaintiff Rudie Jaramillo is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. The action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force and First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants Barrett, Bartolo, Burnes, Garcia, Hernandez, Rodriguez, and Ruiz. I. BACKGROUND The Court issued its Order Finding Service Appropriate on December 13, 2024. (Doc. 20.) Defendants Barrett, Bartolo, Burnes, Garcia, Hernandez, and Ruiz filed a notice of intent to waive service on January 24, 2025 (Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.