Johnathon Ervin v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 JOHNATHON ERVIN, Case № 2:24-cv-10311-ODW (KSx)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING
v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION [23]
14 AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC et al.,
15 Defendants.
16 I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Amazon Services, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Logistics, Inc., 19 Golden State FC, LLC, Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., and Kim Herzog 20 (collectively, “Amazon”) move to compel Plaintiff Johnathon Ervin to arbitrate his 21 claims against them and stay this action. (Mot. Compel Arb. (“Mot.” or “Motion”), 22 ECF No. 23.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Amazon’s Motion.1 II. BACKGROUND On August 22, 2019, Ervin’s business—Battle Tested Strategies, LLC 25 (“BTS”)—executed a Delivery Service Partner (“DSP”) Agreement with Amazon that 26 governed “the transportation, delivery, and related services . . . performed by [BTS].”
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers…