CDCR
(PC) Lopez v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTIAN LOPEZ, No. 1:24-cv-00729-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
v. (ECF No. 24) CDCR, et al.,
Defendants.
16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds solely against the unknown Defendant at the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison, Corcoran (“SATF”) for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s safety. (ECF No. 18.) The Court did not find service appropriate for the unknown Doe Defendant, and allowed Plaintiff to issue a subpoena to SATF in order to identify the Doe Defendant described in the operative complaint. (ECF No. 18.) On February 21, 2025, Plaintiff completed and returned the subpoena. (ECF No. 19.) On February 25, 2025, the Court directed service of the subpoena by the United States Marshal on the Litigation Coordinator at SATF providing a thirty-day…