Clark v. Nordic Naturals, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAYNA CLARK, Case No. 24-cv-04058-EKL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

NORDIC NATURALS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendant.

13 This false advertising action arises out of Plaintiff’s purchase of Defendant’s omega-3 fish oil supplements and her allegations that the product labels are false and misleading. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 27 (“Mot.”). The Court carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and heard argument on February 5, 2025. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED as to Count 1 (various state consumer protection acts) and Count 3 (California Consumer Legal Remedies Act). Defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Count 2 (California False Advertising Law), Count 4 (California Unfair Competition Law), Count 5 (express warranty), Count 6 (quasi-contract), Count 7 (negligent …