Alvarez

Alvarez v. Morris Shea Bridge Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20251:24-cv-01487California1,943 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SERGIO ALVAREZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-01487-KES-BAM Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING LEAVE

TO AMEND

v. (Doc. 1) MORRIS SHEA BRIDGE COMPANY,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Sergio Alvarez (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil action on December 6, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On February 5, 2025, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations to dismiss this action as duplicative of a then-pending appeal. (Doc. 4.) While those Findings and Recommendations were pending, the Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal. Accordingly, the Findings and Recommendations were vacated. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff’s complaint is now before the Court for screening. I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.