Diana Pauline Avila v. National Distribution Center, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20255:25-cv-00667California1,772 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I.

INTRODUCTION

On December 30, 2024, plaintiff Diana Pauline Avila (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action by filing a Complaint in Riverside County Superior Court against defendants National Distribution Centers, LLC, NFI Interactive Logistics, LLC, and NFI Management Services, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging various state claims arising out of Plaintiff’s employment with Defendants. Dkt. 1-1, Complaint (“Compl.”). On March 13, 2025, Defendants filed a Notice of Removal (“Notice”), asserting diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1441, and 1446. Dkt. 1. On April 1, 2025, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion to Remand (“Motion”). Dkt. 14, Motion (“Mot.”).

The Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L.R. 7-15. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is

DENIED.

///

///

///

1 On April 1, 2025, Plaintiff filed a proposed order related to her Motion but apparently selected the event entry for “Motion to Remand”. Dkt. 15.

II.

BACKGROUND

On December 30, 2024, Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a Complaint in Riverside County Superior Court. Compl. According to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.