Cindy Flores v. City of Laguna Beach

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20258:24-cv-01898California4,441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CINDY FLORES, an individual; Case No. 8:24-cv-01898-JVS-JDE ALEJANDRA HURTADO, an individual; MIA VILLEGAS, an STIPULATED PROTECTIVE individual; JASON AFLAGUE, an ORDER individual; and ZACHARY MILLER, an individual, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v.

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH, CITY

OF NEWPORT BEACH, and DOES 1- 10, Inclusive, 18 Defendants.

Based on the Parties’ Stipulation (Dkt. 31) and for good cause shown, the Court finds and orders as follows. 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.