(PS) Roberts v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20252:22-cv-01699California1,074 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SYDNEY BROOKE ROBERTS, et al., No. 2:22-cv-01699-DJC-AC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiffs have filed an “Emergency Motion” before the Court seeking a stay of discovery deadlines pending review of all dispositive findings and recommendations, sanctions against Defendants for discovery violations, an order for a complete witness list, an extension of discovery and related deadlines, an evidentiary hearing, “review [of] all lodged document dump and materials[,]” and an order reassigning this action under 28 U.S.C. § 455. (Mot. (ECF No. 119).) The Motion covers a number of unrelated grievances with Defendants’ conduct during discovery and the procedural management of this case. The Motion is effectively multiple separate motions combined into a single motion. These individual motions that are either not properly before the undersigned or seek reconsideration of prior orders without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.