Valencia

(PC) McClintock v. Valencia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20252:22-cv-01884California2,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN MCCLINTOCK, No. 2:22-cv-1884 KJM CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER G. VALENCIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery is before the Court. As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion to compel is denied without prejudice. I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS On May 23, 2024, the district court ordered that this case proceeds on the following claims: (1) First Amendment retaliation claims as to defendants G. Valencia, L. Cantu and T. Cooper (claims one, two and ten); (2) Plaintiff’s claim that defendants Weaver, Luther and Hadden confiscated and destroyed a box of plaintiff’s legal materials in retaliation for plaintiff pursuing litigation as evidenced by the materials in the box that were clearly labeled (claims five, six and seven); and (3) Plaintiff’s claim that in August of 2020, defendants J. Cantu, Vega, Sgt. T. Coker, and Lt. J. Charon violated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.