Covello

(PC) Hardin v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20252:23-cv-01902California1,755 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY THOMAS HARDIN, JR., No. 2:23-cv-1902 DAD AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PATRICK COVELLO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. The original and first amended complaints were screened and found to not state any claims for relief. ECF Nos. 9, 16. Plaintiff was given a final opportunity to amend the complaint and has filed a second amended complaint. ECF No. 30. He has also filed motions for an extension of time (ECF No. 28), for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 29), and for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 31). I. Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 29. However, he was previously granted such leave (ECF No. 9), and the instant request will be denied as unnecessary. II. Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.