(PS) Starks v. FPI Management
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN STARKS, No. 2:25-cv-01382-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FPI MANAGEMENT, et al.
Defendants. 16 On June 2, 2025, plaintiff Kevin Starks filed a motion requesting a preliminary injunction which the Court construes as requesting emergency relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65. (ECF No. 15.) Because plaintiff proceeds without counsel, this matter is referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. This motion is appropriate for decision without oral argument under Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth below, the motion for preliminary injunction should be denied. I. Background Defendant I.Q. Data International, Inc. removed this action to this Court on May 14, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s initial complaint was filed in the San Joaquin County Superior Court on March 25, 2025, against defendants FPI Management; Patmon Company,…