CDCR
(PC) Soto v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM SOTO, Case No. 2:25-cv-1543-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff has filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, and a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF No. 2. However, plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Soto v. Kolb, Case No. 2:09-cv-1654-FCD-CMK (E.D. Cal. August 20, 2009) (recognizing plaintiff as a “three-striker” within in the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)). The court takes judicial notice of the following cases constituting strikes: (1) Soto v. Jordan, Case No. 2:08-cv-2687-LLK-GGH (P), dismissed February 20, 2009; (2) Soto v. California Dep’t of Corrections, Case No. 2:07-cv-1908-FCD-EFB (P), dismissed August 12, 2008; (3) Soto v. California Dep’t of Corrections, Case No. 2:07-cv-1777-JAM-KJM (P), dismissed October 9, 2008. A “three-striker”…