Bondi

Ortiz Gutierrez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202524-2878California2,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ANGEL ORTIZ GUTIERREZ, No. 24-2878 Agency No. Petitioner, A213-083-462 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 10, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges. Partial dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.

Jose Angel Ortiz Gutierrez petitions for review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) order upholding an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying

his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We grant the petition in part, deny in part,

and remand to the BIA for further proceedings.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. “When the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision with a citation to Matter of

Burbano[, 20 I. & N. Dec. 872, 874 (B.I.A. 1994),]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.