Alvarez-Acosta

Alvarez-Acosta v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202522-548California947 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMANDO ALVAREZ-ACOSTA, No. 22-548 Agency No. Petitioner, A088-356-528 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submission Deferred March 19, 2025** Submitted June 6, 2025

Before: BOGGS,*** FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Armando Alvarez-Acosta (Alvarez), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal

from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order denying his application for cancellation of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, sitting by designation. removal. “Where, as here,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.