United States v. Wesley Sudbury

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 202522-10265California783 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10265

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00384-LEK-6 v.

WESLEY MARK SUDBURY, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 4, 2025** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Wesley Sudbury appeals his conviction for conspiring to manufacture,

distribute, and possess with intent to distribute 100 or more marijuana plants, along

with related offenses. He argues that the district court improperly denied his motion

to compel discovery and his motion for relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3504(a)(1). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.