Razuki
Razuki v. Amguard Insurance Company
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SALAM RAZUKI, No. 24-2352 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:21-cv-01983-AJB-DEB v.
MEMORANDUM*
AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY GUARD
INSURANCE COMPANIES, DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 3, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: HURWITZ, MILLER, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In this diversity action, Salam Razuki asserts that AmGUARD Insurance
Company (“AmGUARD”) breached his insurance policy (the “Policy”) by refusing
to cover losses from a fire that damaged a multi-tenant commercial building. The
district court…